For over a decade, the name Jeffrey Epstein hasn’t just represented a scandal—it became a political weapon. Across election cycles, Epstein was wielded to attack opponents, score headlines, and shape narratives. Leading Democratic figures and aligned media repeatedly highlighted his connections to Donald Trump, framing the financier as a mirror for alleged moral failings.
Epstein became shorthand for corruption, privilege, and misconduct—but selectively. Public focus zeroed in on Trump, while broader networks of influence—spanning donors, celebrities, and politicians across parties—were largely ignored. Epstein’s web extended deep into finance, academia, philanthropy, and politics, touching elites on both sides of the aisle.
This selective scrutiny served immediate political goals—but planted seeds of future complications. Treating a complex, morally fraught network as a weapon, rather than a societal issue, limited principled inquiry.
Continue reading on next page…